Namibia

Structural violence and social suffering among the San of southern Africa

Publication Type  Journal Article
Authors  Renée Sylvain
Journal Title  Indigenous Affairs
Year of Publication  2007
Volume  07
Issue  4
Pages  16-21
Key Words  social suffering; San; Namibia; Angola; Botswana; South Africa; alcoholism; violence
Notes  

As a contribution to an Indigenous Affairs issue focused on the social suffering of indigenous people around the world, Renée Sylvain describes the reality of the approximately 100,000 San people that live in southern Africa. They suffer from deprivation of land, autonomy, dignity and social cohesion, which has created economic and psychological insecurity. Symptoms of this condition that manifest in San culture today are alcoholism, high risk behavior, intergenerational alienation and violence.

In Botswana, the dominant Tswana ethnic group disregards the indigenous ethnicity of the San. After the government legally dispossessed them of their territories, they were classified as Remote Area Dwellers, a generic term for rural poor people. This classification subjects them to aggressive development programs that overlook issues of ethnicity at the root of their social suffering. The case of the Central Kalahari Game Reserve is cited and described as a process that has highly victimized the San, resettling them to new villages characterized by poverty, alcoholism and despair.

The story of the San in Angola revolves around militarization and relocation. San were recruited or coercively conscripted to fight in the Angolan war for independence in the 1960s, then soldiers were co-opted in 1970s liberation movements in Namibia and later relocated to a South African army base in the 1990s. Nearly three decades of civil war in Angola have led to severe food insecurity, discrimination, and health problems for the San living there. Since ceasefire in 2002, Angolan society has had to absorb the return of 400,000 refugees and the demobilization of 80,000 soldiers. Former San soldiers are heavily impacted by the experience of war, resulting in alcoholism and domestic and intra-community violence.

During colonial rule in Namibia, San were dispossessed of their native territories. Today they live and work on white-owned cattle ranches, in government resettlement camps or in urban squatter settlements. San men and women suffer ethnic discrimination such as drastically unfair wage rates that tie them to their employers in systems of debt-bondage. Often the only nutritional item they can buy is beer brewed on the cattle posts. There are reports of child slavery and sexual abuse by the dominant ethnicities there. San have assimilated some of the cultural norms of these ethnic groups, such as sexism; domestic violence and alcoholism are now rife in San communities. Sylvain describes the social situation surrounding illicit brewing and cuca-shops that sell beer on credit to San in an urban zone of Namibia. It has led to gangs and sex work for young San, increased incidence of rape among San women by San and non-San men and raised the risk of HIV infection. Furthermore, when San seek health care at medical centers, they are confronted by discrimination by non-San medical workers.

Sylvain notes that damage suffered in intra-community and family relationships among the San is severely debilitating to their culture because strong kin networks are a fundamental constitutive element of their ethnic identity.

Prepared by Megan Glore

Disorderly development: Globalization and the idea of “culture” in the Kalahari

Publication Type  Journal Article
Authors  Renée Sylvain
Journal Title  American Ethnologist
Year of Publication  2005
Volume  32
Issue  3
Pages  354-370
Key Words  globalization; indigenous identity; Bushmen; San; development; ethnotourism; Namibia
Notes  

This article examines and expands upon theories of globalization in relation to indigenous identity politics. The author grounds these ideas in the context of the San people of the Omaheke region of the Kalahari Desert in Namibia. Case studies address the local shaping of racial stereotypes and classism, NGO challenges and donor expectations, and the ethnotourism industry.

The response of indigenous cultures to the forces of globalization is discussed, along with the history of indigenous activism, Fourth World Theory and definitions of indigeneity. Sylvain reflects on intensified and essentialized representations of local cultures that are being promoted by indigenous people, the tourist industry and NGOs. The author suggests that current ethnic assertions of local culture are more than just a psychological defense against the globalization of Western or American mass culture. It is posited that a more fundamental aspect of globalization is the dissemination of a Western conceptual definition of culture as a timeless and geographically bound entity. Local actors, such as the San, thus deploy this conception of culture as an effective tool for getting political, economic development resources.

The history of the Omaheke's settlement by white farmers and ensuing land, labor and political struggles are shown to have shaped a stereotype of San people as primitive, 'wild' and incapable of integrating themselves into full time forms of employment. This stereotype serves to justify white farmers' widespread exploitation of San labor. Their dispossession, poverty, and underclass status strip them of what outsiders consider to be their bushman culture. Frequent relocation of San people who are constantly searching for employment further separates San reality from the popular conception of what an authentic San person should be like. Despite this, the author cites San interview data showing that the San themselves have internal social mechanisms that are strong markers of San culture.

Numerous examples of local corruption and political disorder are cited from the author's field work. Development NGOs (such as OST and WIMSA) seek to fill this vacuum of order. They focus on empowering San people through bolstering their cultural identity. International donors are sold on ideas of 'cultural survival', thus the NGOs are financially dependent on promotion of traditional San culture. This is a problem for NGOs committed to protecting San human rights because promotion of an inaccurate, stereotypical picture of San existence perpetuates dehumanizing and discriminatory forces.

Tourism is rapidly expanding in Namibia and its lack of regulation has facilitated the proliferation of ethnotourism capitalizing on San stereotypes. Numerous examples of San exploitation by 'ethnic entrepreneurs' are cited. It is concluded that while the San, NGOs and ethnotourism can capitalize on the commodification of a certain representation of San culture, the reality of San people is obscured and their exploitation and marginalization are sustained.

Prepared by Megan Glore

Feedback